#1 2014-05-22 17:49:05

dougmc
Administrator
Registered: 2008-06-01
Posts: 623

Another view of the collision on 620 last Saturday

http://www.bicyclelaw.com/blog/index.cf … Windshield

This is based on the story reported at http://www.statesman.com/news/news/loca … h-t/nf4Rd/ , which I don't think was reported here, as the cyclist survied (so far ... I haven't heard any news on if he's still in critical condition or what.)

Offline

#2 2014-05-23 22:43:49

badgnome
Member
Registered: 2012-01-26
Posts: 50

Re: Another view of the collision on 620 last Saturday

Not sure I understand the reason for not charging the driver who was making the turn.  He didn't say the cyclist was speeding and of course traveling in the should is legal for cyclists.

Offline

#3 2014-05-29 00:09:33

dougmc
Administrator
Registered: 2008-06-01
Posts: 623

Re: Another view of the collision on 620 last Saturday

That's kind of the point of this article -- it's quite clear who's at fault, at least to everybody who actually knows the laws, anyways.  Which, unfortunately, doesn't seem to include the Lakeway police chief.

Offline

Registered users online in this topic: 0, guests: 1
[Bot] ClaudeBot

Board footer

[ Generated in 0.012 seconds, 7 queries executed - Memory usage: 527.63 KiB (Peak: 528.25 KiB) ]