Austin a Top 10 Bicycling City?
Last update: October 2017
Selected U.S. Cities
scores are from WalkScore.com
on 12/31/12. As of that date, these are the only 25
cities that WalkScore has calculated a bikeability index for.
Austin is sometimes rated as one of the top bicycling cities in the America,* but it doesn't deserve that reputation. In fact:
- Austin gets a dismal Bike Score of 51 (out of 100) from WalkScore.com, which ranks us in the bottom half of U.S. cities with a population of at least 500,000. (2019)
- Austin doesn't rank in the top 19 bicycle-friendly cities rated by the League of American Bicyclists in 2012. (We're at the Silver level, where places #20-57 are all lumped together.)
- Austin also ranks 9th for #RoadRage posts on Instagram, even though the city is 11th in population, meaning we have more road rage per capita than other cities.
- Cars can legally park in many bike lanes.
It's a weird "bike-friendly" city where the bike lanes are for cars
(e.g., on Shoal Creek Blvd.).
- No bike lanes on new roads. City planners sometimes ignore cyclists' needs when building new roads, such as with the new Mueller subdivision.
- No bicycle boulevards.
Twelve U.S. cities have bicycle
boulevards. Austin is not one of them.
- Lots of hit-and-run drivers. Austin has the special shame of having a hit-and-run rate that's 50% higher than the national average. (2012)
- Horrible drivers, worse than average. Austin ranks a pathetic 159 out of 200 cities for driver safety. (2014) Austin drivers are the worst in the state, for things such as DUI, collisions, speeding, running red lights, and using cell phones while driving. (2017)
- Hostility towards cyclists & cycling infrastructure. When local news reports about a cyclist killed by a driver, you can count on the Comments section below the article to be filled with people blaming the cyclist, even if the driver was clearly at fault. When an article reports on new infrastructure like bike lanes or bicycle traffic signal, the Comments section will be filled with people decrying the "waste of money" and calling city leaders "idiots" for trying to promote bicycling.
- Weak prosecution of at-fault drivers. At-fault drivers in Austin frequently get weak to no penalties for hitting cyclists, even when the cyclist dies, or the driver was drunk, or both. Sometimes it seems that the best way to get away with running a red light in Austin is to kill a bicyclist while you're doing it. Here are tons of older examples and some more recent examples.
- City won't take responsibility for police who hit cyclists. Video caught a careless police officer making an illegal turn into a cyclist, sending him to the emergency room. That would have been bad enough, but then the City wouldn't own up to their responsibility so the cyclist had to sue in order to get compensation for his injuries. (He got only $3000, not nearly enough to cover his medical expenses.) (Austin Chronicle)
- Not as many cyclists as the top
cities for cycling.
• Austin ranked in 120th place among 375 cities for the percentage of commuters who bike to work. (2010 Am. Community Survey)
• Austin ranked 22nd among the 70 largest cities for the percentage of commuters who bike to work from 2000-2010. (Am. Community Survey)
• We're not among the top 10 metro areas for percentage of people biking to work. (2009 Census; Austin's explicit rank not listed)
• We rank an abysmal 57th among cities greater than 250,000 people for the percentage of car-free households. (2000 U.S. Census)
• (However, Austin does have the 2nd-highest percentage of bike commuters (1.88%) among the largest 15 cities in the U.S.) (Governing, 2011)
- Blatant hostility and violence towards cyclists. Recently a driver shot a bicyclist in the face with a shotgun. After the shooting, witnesses failed to call 911. Numerous cyclists have reported being yelled at or having things thrown at them (including this editor). The comments section under local news articles are typically filled with anti-bicyclist vitriol, where commenters suggest that it's okay to run over bicyclists.
- Cheering on the DWI culture. Our local alternative weekly newspaper, the Austin Chronicle, runs an annual Readers' Poll. In 2017, out of the mere 21 categories in the Service Businesses section, one of them was "Best DWI lawyer".
- Cheating cyclists out of voter-approved
bond money, 1980s & 90s. "In the early
Eighties, voters approved almost $2 million in bonds to implement
the Austin Bikeway Plan, which called for a comprehensive citywide
network to include 160 miles of new bicycle lanes, and other
policies designed to break down barriers to continuous cycling. The
result, according to a 1993 report of the Austin Transportation
Study: only 49 miles of bike lanes were set aside, and of these, all
but six are being used for parallel parking by motorists. Few of the
other recommendations of the Austin Bikeway Plan were implemented,
including bike route signage, provision of wide outside lanes on new
road projects, and bike lane maintenance. Ironically, over half of
the $2 million in bonds approved by voters was transferred from its
intended use for bike lanes to pedestrian and trail projects. And,
incredible as it sounds, $368,000, or about 20% of the total, went
to fund the Veloway at Circle C, a facility that allows
exercise-deprived suburbanites to burn off the accumulated stresses
of week-day commuting by riding bicycles around in a circle on
- Cheating cyclists out of voter-approved
bond money, 2005-06. "Voters passed $150
million in transportation bonds in 2000 (Proposition 1), which was
supposed to be spent at $15M per year for ten years, and was
supposed to include bike projects. In March 2006,
Councilmember Raul Alvarez asked the city to reveal how the money
had been spent so far. The answer was that the first $67.2
million ALL went for SH 130 right of way, and not a penny for any of
the the other things promised to the bond voters on the ballot,
including bike projects! As a result of Alvarez' request, $10
million was proposed (with about $5 million so far for sidewalks).
If you read the Chronicle
article, you will see that $20 million was being promised for bike
and ped projects just before the election." (Roger
- Not enough biking trails.
The City's own survey showed that only
68% of Austinites are satisfied with the number of walking
& biking trails. (2009)
And while San
police ran an undercover sting to catch drivers who pass cyclists
too closely, our own police chief in Austin would rather lecture
cyclists about wearing helmets.
The first time Austin got a "top cycling city" award, Bike Texas (then TBC) sent a congratulatory note to the Austin City Council, commending them for their efforts (below). But really, what is good about local cycling really couldn't have been credited to the city council at that point, which had done nothing or even worked against us far more often than they helped us. Below is the congratulatory letter from Bike Texas to the council, followed by a critique I sent to the council. None of the councilmembers responded to that, except for Willie Lewis, who wrote only, "Thank you for your information."
Austin was the #7 U.S. city for bike theft in 2002, according to Kryptonite.
TBC's letter congratulating the City Council on Austin's first Top Ten ranking
- Dear Mayor and Council Members,
- You are to be congratulated!
- The latest issue of Bicycling Magazine ranks Austin in the top ten of North American cities in which to ride. It is by your work and that of former City Council Members that Austin is the bicycle friendly city that it is.
- The criteria for making the top ten includes the Yellow Bike Project, bicycle racks, bike trails and an active bike commuter population. All of the things that the City supports. The article in Bicycling has a photograph of the city skyline and a great photo of one of the Yellow Bike Project members carting yellow bikes around to be distributed. Activists, commuters, recreational riders, racers and transportation cyclists all look forward to continuing the tradition of leading the nation in bike friendly action.
- As President of the Austin Cycling Association, the largest cycling organization in the area, I am proud to be able to say Thank You to each one of you.
- Preston Tyree, President, Austin Cycling Association
- Education Director, Texas Bicycle Coalition
Jan. 21, 1999
Michael Bluejay's response
- From: Michael Bluejay
- To: Texas Bicycle Coalition
- Garcia, Gus - Austin City Council
- Goodman, Jackie
- Griffith, Beverly
- Lewis, Willie
- Slusher, Daryl
- Spelman, Bill
- Watson, Kirk-Austin City Council
- CC: austin bicycle email discussion list
- Date: Jan. 24, 1999
- Dear Councilmembers & Texas Bicycle Coalition:
- If Austin is one of the Top 10 North American cities for cycling, then that only demonstrates how terrible North America is for cycling and not how wonderful Austin is. Reviewing the details, it certainly appears that the City Council deserves more blame than credit:
- #1: PARKING IN BICYCLE LANES
- It is legal for cars to park in most bicycle lanes in the City. So why even call them bike lanes? If cyclists can't use them, then what's the point? I addressed the previous Council about this issue, but the Council didn't express any interest in addressing it. Eric Mitchell wrongly stated that it was already illegal for cars to park in bike lanes. Gus Garcia, Willie Lewis, and Bill Spelman's representative (Mike Blizzard) said on my radio program that they supported car-free bike lanes, but so far there's been no action from Council. Due to non-action by the Council, other bicycle advocates have been working with Transportation & Public Works to establish car-free bike lanes. But even if they succeed in getting cars banned from more bike lanes, another problem that remains is enforcement. I see cars illegally parked in the bike lanes in my neighborhood on Rio Grande and Nueces nearly EVERY DAY [two of the few bike lanes where it's already illegal for cars to park]. The police usually come if I call them about it, but they don't take the effort to ticket cars unless someone calls it in. On this issue, the council deserves blame and not credit.
- #2: FAILURE TO FUND THE BICYCLE PROGRAM
- The Council has historically under- or non-funded the Bicycle Program. Here's the opening from a late 1997 letter by Rick Waring, former Coordinator of the City's Bicycle Program:
- "Dear Mayor Watson and City Council members: I am extremely disappointed. The 1998 budget you approved has zero dollars in allocations for bicycle and pedestrian program needs and service provision. Frankly, this is one of the reasons I resigned my position [as the City's Bicycle Coordinator]. We initiated and built the program without a budget for three and a half years. With the election of your progressive council, I was certain that finally City leaders would show their commitment and provide badly needed funding for bicycle and pedestrian access and safety. You did not, but I should not have been surprised; Austin has a long history of lip service without real commitment to bicyclists and pedestrians. Witness allowing parking in bike lanes and lack of maintenance of existing bicycle facilities." [The complete letter appears at the end of this email.] Here again, the council deserves blame and not credit.
- #3: CREATING THE HELMET ORDINANCE AND FAILING TO FULLY REPEAL IT
- A couple of years ago the City Council created what was probably the most unpopular ordinance in Austin history when it enacted the bicycle helmet ordinance. But the council didn't just ignore the will of the people, it ignored the facts -- that on average, only 1-4 cyclists die in Austin each year, that some of those who die were wearing helmets ANYWAY, that many more pedestrians and motorists die than cyclists and THEY don't have to wear helmets, that motorcyclists are not required to wear helmets, etc. Disturbingly, the council felt it was more important to try to force the use of a piece of equipment that *might* help us once we've been hit rather than PREVENTING US FROM GETTING HIT IN THE FIRST PLACE (by getting cars out of bike lanes, by funding the Bicycle Program, etc.). Also disturbingly, the council was completely unconcerned that its local police was using the helmet ordinance as an excuse to arrest cyclists left and right and throw them in JAIL. (And for comparison, when was the last time you heard of a motorist being not just ticketed, but taken to JAIL for not wearing a seatbelt?) And despite the fact that at the time 70% of the no-helmet tickets given to kids were given to black & Hispanic kids, the council kept the helmet ordinance intact for kids when amending it. An advocate from the League of Bicycling Voters informed me that councilmember Slusher refused a compromise on the helmet ordinance which would have kept the ordinance but removed the penalties, since Slusher insisted on having a punitive ordinance. I also witnessed Slusher misleading the citizenry at the helmet ordinance hearing and tricking them into giving up their speaking time, promising that a "repeal" was imminent, when in fact the council intended not to repeal but rather to amend, and kept the law intact for kids. Here again, the council deserves blame and not credit.
- #4: POLICE HARASSMENT
- I've lost count of how many cyclists I've met who were ARRESTED for minor traffic infractions. Not just ticketed, but ARRESTED. Just recently my friend Jennifer Sigman was arrested and taken to jail for riding her bicycle on the sidewalk downtown. The police in this City have no accountability to anyone. The council's compromise earlier this year was basically worthless since it did not provide for a Citizen's Review Board. This is a major failing of the council. Here again, the council deserves blame and not credit.
- #5: MOTORISTS WHO HIT CYCLISTS DON'T FACE CONSEQUENCES
- About half of the serious car-bike collisions in Austin are hit & runs. The council's continuing treatment of cyclists as second-class citizens only reinforces that same mindset in motorists and makes them unconcerned about hitting or even killing us. These hit & run motorists don't face any consequences because nobody knows who they are and they're never caught. But even when the motorists are known, often nothing will happen to them. Police officers routinely fail to ticket or charge drivers who injure cyclists even when the drivers are clearly at fault. And even though the Tom Churchill case made it to a grand jury, the grand jury failed to indict the motorist although he was clearly at-fault. The council could set an example for the police and grand jurors by treating cycling and cyclists with respect, but through antagonistic action (e.g., the helmet ordinance) and lack of action in other areas (e.g., cars in bike lanes, funding for the Bicycle Program), it helps foster the attitude that cyclists don't matter. Here again, the council deserves blame and not credit.
- #6: THE YELLOW BIKE PROJECT
- One of the reasons cited in the Bicycling article for ranking Austin in the Top 10 was the Yellow Bike Program. Of course, the Council deserves no credit for this because the Yellow Bike Project is not a City program, it's a private non-profit organization. And the Council's helmet ordinance nearly killed the whole program before it even got properly established, with police officers arresting people who tried to use the free yellow bikes without helmets. The Yellow Bike Project was able to secure a shop space from the City in exchange for providing the City with bicycles for employees to use, but the Yellow Bikers had to go through a year of the City's red tape before they could actually move into the space.
- #7: THE VELOWAY
- After not spending money for nearly a decade which had been authorized by voters to build bike lanes and make other biking improvements, an earlier City Council threw most of that money away on the Veloway, a recreation & racing loop outside the (then) City limits, which does absolutely nothing to aid cycle commuting in the City.
- Does any City Councilmember actually have any concrete plans for addressing any of the above issues? I doubt it.
- Dear Mayor Watson and City Council members:
- I am extremely disappointed. The 1998 budget you approved has zero dollars in allocations for bicycle and pedestrian program needs and service provision. Frankly, this is one of the reasons I resigned my position [as the City's Bicycle Coordinator]. We initiated and built the program without a budget for three and a half years. With the election of your progressive council, I was certain that finally City leaders would show their commitment and provide badly needed funding for bicycle and pedestrian access and safety. You did not, but I should not have been surprised; Austin has a long history of lip service without real commitment to bicyclists and pedestrians. Witness allowing parking in bike lanes and lack of maintenance of existing bicycle facilities.
- In 1994 the City Council created the Bicycle Program Coordinator position, but did not provide funding for the position. This forced the Department of Public Works and Transportation to shift funding to provide salary for the unfunded staff position. The first words the Assistant Director told me when I started the job was "you have no budget". I should have walked right out the door, but I thought, "This is April and next fiscal year we'll receive funding." We did not. In subsequent years, neither City management nor Council provided any program or service provision funding. We did our best "borrowing" from other budgets and using long-term debt bond funding to provide daily services, but this was grossly inadequate and a fiscally poor choice as well. Now all bicycle bonds are expended, yet you provided no funding for the program. How do you expect staff to provide services without funding?
- To soften the blow of providing absolutely no funding, advocates were told of a transportation retreat to be held in October during which reallocation of funds in the existing budget for bicycle and pedestrian needs would be discussed. Of course, this would mean "robbing Peter to pay Paul," but it would be better than nothing. Now I hear the retreat is postponed until December. December? Do you really plan to hold this retreat during the holiday season? I will not be surprised if the retreat is delayed again and may canceled altogether. I would ask when the Bicycle Plan, Part II will come forward for adoption, but without funding it hardly matters.
- United States population is doubling ever 20 to 40 years depending on the popularity of a allocation. Austin's is slated to double in 20. Since 1990, registrations of motor vehicles in Travis County exceeded population growth by three percent, yet the City Council lacked the courage to create a pedestrian staff position. Anyone who walks in Austin knows how much work is needed to overcome years of neglect and inattention. Anyone who has worked in the Transportation Department knows there isn't enough staff or resources to do this job. And anyone who cares enough to examine recent results knows very little of long-accumulated pedestrian demand has been addressed. If it weren't for [the federal Americans with Disabilities Act], even the disabled would probably still be ignored.
- I am encouraged by your efforts to support downtown development in spite of the fact that this is an easy decision; developers stand to gain and no neighborhoods oppose the increased density. Nevertheless, those knowledgeable of what it takes to preserve a fine city are grateful.
- Now make a tough decision. Via a budget amendment allocate funding for bicycle and pedestrian services and make a strong statement of their importance to the vitality, health and future of the city. Please do not do this only in a surreptitious way by shifting funding within an existing budget &emdash; while this would help, it does not establish program funding nor does it publicly support using bicycles and walking for transportation.
- I cannot know how tough your jobs are, but I have some idea. I realize the pressure must be very intense and the criticism never ending. I applaud you for your courage and willingness to serve. While you have this opportunity, please take steps to establish funding for these badly needed services. Although I was able to secure grants for staffing and some program expenses for the present, grant funding is not likely to be available for staff or program expenses in the future. Thank you for your consideration of this request and for the difficult jobs you do.
- Rick Waring.
- P.S. Please do not send this letter to City staff to write your response. I would appreciate hearing from you about this critical issue. I know you are busy, but you can dictate a reply to your office staff and tell us what you plan to do, not what City staff thinks you plan to do.
- [FYI: In 6/01, we learned that Rick Waring had become the Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety Program Manager for the Oregon Dept. of Transportation.]
Also check out our coverage of the City Council.
Dan Connelly critiques the bikability of part of Austin
Posted to the austin-bikes email list, 7-8-00
Lance Armstrong quote
Lance Armstrong's remarks about cycling in Austin, from the Austin American-Statesman, 8-4-01:
On Friday, he met with members of the congressional Bike Caucus in Washington, lamenting Austin's lightning growth and traffic problems.
"A city like Austin is growing so much, cycling is ruined there," he told U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin, and other members of the group. "In just 10 years -- ruined. A place like Boulder, Colorado, is just ruined, also."
It's no surprise that Armstrong feels this way, given that a redneck tried to run him over with his truck in 1998.
Partial list of Austin's "bike-friendly city" awards
- 2016: Bicycling magazine ranks Austin #7 (out of 50) for bike-friendy U.S. cities.
- 2015: The League of American Bicyclists deems Austin a "Gold"-level bicycle-friendly community (the 2nd-highest honor, right under Platinum)
- 2014: Bicycling magazine ranks Austin #11
- 2012: Bicycling magazine ranks Austin #13
- 2001: Bicycling magazine ranks Austin #2 of cities between 0.5-1.0 million people.
- 1999. LAB rates Austin as one of the Top 10 bicycling cities in North America in 1999.