BIKE: more songs about buildings and food

[maniac]

Here, let me get the logic right:  But for the fact that you were driving
your car, you would not have nearly wrecked it.  Dashed off the last one
in a hurry, thought about it a bit.  This may cut down on the ad hominem
responses, but probably not.

Stuart the Maniac
maniac
http://www.io.com/~maniac

> I haven't contributed on here in a long time mostly because I don't want
> to get involved in silly arguments that get rehashed over and over, but
> what the heck, might as well add some more granola to the fire...
>
> Let's apply the "but for" test to the statement below in a slightly
> skewed, but valid way:
>
> But for the fact that you were driving your car, you nearly wrecked it.
> Had you been walking or riding a bike, you would have not nearly wrecked
> your car.
>
> End of story.
>
> Stuart the Maniac
> maniac
> http://www.io.com/~maniac
>
>>I've nearly wrecked my car at an intersection near UT because some bozo
>>on a bike ran the stop sign. If I were older (worse reflexes), I would
>>have. So there you go.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Get on or off this list here:
> http://lists.bicycleaustin.info/listinfo.cgi/forum-bicycleaustin.info
>