BIKE: Cold Hard Slap Of Reality On Toll Roads
Mike Dahmus
mdahmus
Wed Feb 23 12:30:04 PST 2005
"Its true that the bonds are insured and also have the padding of $66
million in federal TIFIA loans that take the default hit first. But
thats still not enough to take away the enormous risk of default due to
peak oil and soaring fuel prices. Another risk is that the projected
sprawl growth will not materialize where the CTRMA board has its land
investments, and which the roads are designed to enhance."
I'm going to break my own rule and respond (sort-of) to Roger, since
this meme appears to have spread far and wide.
FOLKS: THERE IS ENOUGH TRAFFIC _____TODAY______ to pay off those bonds
with tolls.
TODAY.
There doesn't have to be ANY MORE DEVELOPMENT out there to provide
enough traffic to keep these roads full. These corridors have enough
cars travelling through them RIGHT NOW to fill up 2 or 3 toll lanes in
the primary direction of travel during rush hour with packed frontage
roads left over, which is pretty much all they need to shoot for in
order for them to be an unqualified success financially.
Remember: these toll roads are freeway additions to roads whch, today,
have very very heavy traffic. These aren't Southwest Parkway analogues.
The only one which even remotely worries me is US 183 East, and even
then the airport traffic will probably make up the difference (airport
travellers are the least likely to care about spending a couple of bucks
if the free alternative is unreliable).
Ironically, the three 'old' toll roads (US 183A, SH 45N, and SH 130)
which supposedly are in much better shape are the three LEAST LIKELY to
generate enough cars to pay off the bonds -- especially SH 130. (SH 45N
probably will; US 183A MIGHT but might not, I doubt SH 130 ever will).
And finally, remember: the choice in the REAL WORLD was NEVER "toll
roads vs. no roads". As Patrick finally observed today, the cocoon most
of you live in in Central Austin is a very different world from the one
most suburbanites experience, and there's a lot more of them than there
are of you. All of these roadway expansions would have happened AS FREE
ROADS, JUST A LITTLE LATER ON.
I don't know about you, but the prospect that Circle C Jerks have to pay
a toll to drive into the center-city every day is an unqualified GOOD
THING. Because the alternative was NOT that they don't keep building out
there (because they and we both know TXDOT's gonna build them freeways
either way).
- MD
More information about the Forum-bicycleaustin.info
mailing list