BIKE: Trucking Impacts (Was: "States Mull Taxing Drivers By Mile")
Jeb Boyt
jeboyt
Wed Feb 16 07:54:21 PST 2005
----Original Message Follows----
From: John SomdeCerff <jsomdecerff>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:48:55 -0600
I think charging by the mile makes a lot of sense for semi trucks. A fully
loaded truck causes about 8,000 times the damage to the roads as a car. The
only reasonable way to "level the playing field" is to make them pay for the
damage they inflict. . . .
. . .
Lets charge the trucks for the 90+% of the road damage they inflict, pay the
remaining 10% with gasoline taxes, and use the other $1/gal to reduce our
property taxes. Simple, easy, just, and economically sound.
------------------------------------------
I generally agree with this. I was recently in Croatia and was surprised
that their roads were in so much better shape than ours. Part of that is
due to recent investments, but part is also due to the requirement that
truck trailers have three axels instead of two. A third axel increases
costs for trucking companies, but it lessens the impact of trucks on the
roads by distributing the load more evenly.
This is an easy fix that Congress could require, putting a bit more of the
cost for maintaining our highway system on the trucking companies that
benefit from our highways instead of on the taxpayers as a whole.
Jeb
More information about the Forum-bicycleaustin.info
mailing list