BIKE: Proposed law for $5 MB set aside
Mike Dahmus
mdahmus
Fri Apr 8 09:05:42 PDT 2005
Jeb Boyt wrote:
> <Patrick's post is set out below>
>
> There are three distinct issues raised by the proposed $5 tax: the
> appropriateness of assessing a fee for trail construction, the
> fairness of applying the tax to all cyclists and the fairness of
> asking cyclists with less income to pay the tax. The proposed fee
> will be included in an amendment to HB 1292, relating to allocation
> and use of revenue from the salex tax on sporting goods.
>
> First, as to the appropriateness of the fee, surveys consistently show
> that trails are one of the most preferred and requested facilities.
> The State, in general, and TPWD, in particular, does not have enough
> revenue to meet the state's public land needs. The fee will generate
> much needed funds for cycling trails. More trails means more
> opportunities for cyclists. Getting people on their bikes on a trail
> can be a great gateway for getting people to use their bikes for
> transportation. People who drive to a trail today may attempt to ride
> to the trail tomorrow and will also likely start looking for riding
> opportunities closer to home. In addition, these funds will ensure
> that trails are properly constructed and maintained to minimize any
> impacts to wildlife and water quality.
>
> Second, as to applying the fairness of applying the tax to all
> cyclists, while this fee will not directly benefit road cyclists, it
> is only unfair to those cyclists who never ride trails. Many cyclists
> have road bikes and mountain bikes. Also, all cyclists benefit when
> more safe cycling opportunities are created.
>
> Third, as to the fairness of asking cyclists with less income to pay
> the fee. The fee is structured to apply only to the sales of bikes
> that cost more than $50. That will exempt many cyclists with less
> income. If fairness is still a concern, the exemption could be raised
> to $75 or $100. Raising the exemption would also ensure that it does
> not soon become mooted by inflation.
Even my stepson's Toys-R-Us bike (for occasional trip to/from school)
cost more than $50. It's difficult to buy a bike for less these days.
(I face replacing my commuter bike, which was apparently stolen from my
yard during the couple of weeks I didn't ride around my vacation; and
there's no way I can buy even a used road or touring bike for less than
$200).
- MD
More information about the Forum-bicycleaustin.info
mailing list