BIKE: Cap Met's Vehicle Choice is No Choice, Yet
Phil Hallmark
phil.hallmark
Thu Oct 21 08:42:32 PDT 2004
Mike,
I think the most compelling part of your argument is the shuttle bus
component. And I have been nodding in agreement with it. But, I'm not
sure it is totally accurate to claim that every single rider must
transfer to a shuttle. How many high-rise offices are within a 5-block
radius of the stop downtown? Aren't there quite a few? Yes, the Capitol
and UT people will need to use shuttles. That could be a disaster as you
predict. But there are possibly thousands of people who could walk from
the stop to their office. TOD may not happen out in Leander, but it sure
might downtown. If you were going to build a high-rise office and there
was a commuter rail stop down there, where would you build it? I would
build it as close to the stop as possible.
Even an in-street light rail system requires some amount of walking for
the vast majority of riders. I think a 5-block walk would be perfectly
acceptable to most people. If not, then they would not ride light rail
either, especially if the light rail ride would take longer than
commuter rail due to more stops along the way.
I voted early today since I'll be in Florida during the election. And I
held my nose and voted "for". Steak dinner for you in 2015 if your
predictions come true and this kills transit hopes for Austin.
Anyone want to join me in Florida to do some foot-soldier work? Just a
few days is all they need. It will at least be good for some stories to
the grandkids some day....
http://www.floridagotv.com
Regards,
Phil Hallmark
>From Mike D:
3. Those lucky few being delivered rail service are precisely the people
who have been the LEAST WILLING to ride buses, and yet in order to use
this rail line, they're going to have to ride a bus every single day.
More information about the Forum-bicycleaustin.info
mailing list