BIKE: Percentage of Austin Bike Commuters

[Stuart Werbner]

I would largely agree with what Lane said.

Also, observe that increasing the bike-to-work commuters from 0.76% to 0.96% 
while still disappointingly small, DOES represent a 25% increase. So, 
bike/ped infrastructure IS working where it is being built. I also agree 
with M/D and others that more needs to be done in the burbs, not just in 
terms of cycling infrastructure, but in terms of the basic layout of the 
entire built environment.

In addition, the 0.96% number may not take into account "occasional" 
commuters. and also those who may not be cyling to work, but who may be 
using it for doing errands. Since these are mostly short trips (which are 
disproportionately polluting in a motor vehicle), cyling to do errands can 
make a significant positive impact, and should be more emphasized in the 
burbs as well as in the center city.

Would anyone be able to shed any light on other cycling measurements, such 
as for doing errands? And, what exactly are criteria for the the commute to 
work percentage??

I believe Austin is doing fairly well with what little is being spent on 
bicycle infrastructure.

   __o
_`\<,_
(*)/ (*)
~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Werbner
Annuit Coeptis

"If you were poorand not well connected, you'd be just another butt-head. 
Instead, you get to be called president."



>From: "Lane S. Wimberley" <lane>
>Reply-To: "Lane S.Wimberley" <lane>
>To: David Foster <david-k1971-foster>
>CC: forum
>Subject: Re: BIKE: Percentage of Austin Bike Commuters
>Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:37:00 -0600
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from mc10-f29.hotmail.com ([65.54.166.165]) by 
>mc10-s11.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 30 Nov 
>2004 11:37:13 -0800
>Received: from frida.dreamhost.com ([66.33.206.23]) by mc10-f29.hotmail.com 
>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:37:10 -0800
>Received: from che.dreamhost.com (che.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.23])by 
>frida.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPid 08C3F16D22D; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 
>11:37:10 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from che.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])by 
>che.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPid 1F5DF985AA; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 
>11:37:09 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from loot.dreamhost.com (loot.dreamhost.com [66.33.213.29])by 
>che.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0EE9858Afor 
><forum>;Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:37:06 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from pythagoras 
>(dhcp-216-12-228-87.aus0.tx.us.corp.wayport.net[216.12.228.87])by 
>loot.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827CA2FE28for 
><forum>; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:37:06 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from lane by pythagoras with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))id 
>1CZDo5-00007h-00; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:37:01 -0600
>X-Message-Info: U2wzkPk8/jahMaf+sQtM9U7kGCk06n4Cji7uYILeUhY=
>Delivered-To: forum-bicycleaustin.info
>References: <6.1.0.6.0.20041129083614.028630d0>
>X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
>X-BeenThere: forum-bicycleaustin.info
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: forum-bicycleaustin.info.lists.bicycleaustin.info
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://lists.bicycleaustin.info/listinfo.cgi/forum-bicycleaustin.info>,<mailto:forum-bicycleaustin.info-request?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: 
><http://lists.bicycleaustin.info/private.cgi/forum-bicycleaustin.info>
>List-Post: <mailto:forum-bicycleaustin.info>
>List-Help: 
><mailto:forum-bicycleaustin.info-request?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://lists.bicycleaustin.info/listinfo.cgi/forum-bicycleaustin.info>,<mailto:forum-bicycleaustin.info-request?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: forum-bicycleaustin.info-bounces
>Return-Path: forum-bicycleaustin.info-bounces
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2004 19:37:10.0397 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[FBE9CAD0:01C4D713]
>
>Hi David.  Thanks for this interesting info.  My feeling is that you
>are probably correct in your intuition.  Most of the growth has been
>in the suburbs.  The upside of this is that it means that, in order
>for Austin to have maintained (just under) 1% bike commuters, the
>percentage in the inner city must have increased, perhaps quite a
>bit.  So, since the majority of the spending on bike infrastructure
>has been (correct me if I'm wrong here) in the inner city, I see this
>as confirmation that such spending is effective.
>
>On the downside, I think this also confirms what Mike Dahmus has been
>saying for a long time regarding the need for more spending OUTSIDE
>the city core.  I feel quite comfortable getting just about anywhere
>inside Austin, but once I target a destination north of 183, or out
>west of, say, 360, I'm compelled to leave the bike in the garage and
>jump in the car.  Ugh.
>
>My physical therapist was saying the same thing to me just this
>morning.  He would happily commute the 17 miles from Leander in to his
>office -- wishes he could -- but the route is just too hairy.  Ie,
>there just aren't any reasonably safe routes out in the car-centric
>design of the 'burbs.  Just makes me angry when a place so obviously
>displays a car bias in its design, to the utter exclusion of all other
>forms of transportation.
>
>But then, I'm just preaching to the choir, eh?
>
>I was in Dallas last weekend.  I grew up in Dallas (I know; save your
>pity).  It is still a very car-intensive city, but I must say that the
>light rail is really impressive.  Limited at the moment, but very
>cool.  It is largely (if not entirely) grade-separated, and still very
>accessible.  And, I also saw far more cyclists in the lower Greenville,
>Lakewood, Lake Highlands and other areas than I ever saw twenty five
>years ago when I used to live there.
>
>-Lane
>
>David Foster writes:
> > I have run across a great web page which allows you to query U.S. census
> > data to create tables of stats for how people get to work in U.S. 
>cities:
> > http://www.bikesatwork.com/carfree/carfree-census-database.html. This is
> > not to be confused with bikestowork.com which Michael Bluejay lists on 
>his
> > web page.
> >
> > The bikeatwork web page allows you to create tables which rank cities of
> > different size or in different states by % of bike commuters, walk
> > commuters, transit users, non-car users, and households without a car. 
>The
> > tables list stats for both the 1990 and 2000 census so you can get some
> > idea of how things have changed.
> >
> > Sadly but perhaps not surprisingly, Austin does not rank so well. Among
> > cities of 250,00 and more we rank 17th in % of bike-to-work commuters at
> > 0.96%. This is only slightly higher than the
> > 0.76%  for 1990. Among Texas cities, Austin ranks 4th, behind College
> > Station, Galveston and Bryan. In College Station and Bryan, the high % 
>of
> > college students skews the number for the good, no doubt.
> >
> > The census numbers for Austin corresponds closely to the numbers CAMPO
> > produces every three years in its travel survey. The most recent one was
> > done earlier this year and can be found on the CAMPO web page
> > www.campotexas.org; the link is on the home page under the title '2004
> > CAMPO Transportation Issues Survey Executive Summary.' According to this
> > survey, the % of bike commuters in 2004 remains about where it was 10 
>years
> > ago, at 1%. This is distressing since we created a bike program and 
>passed
> > a two-part bike plan in 1996 and 1997, have approved bond money for bike
> > projects, etc.  Perhaps the 'good' news is that the number of bike
> > commuters in absolute terms must have risen since we have gained so much
> > population since 1990, so our numbers must be keeping pace, roughly, 
>with
> > this growth.
> >
> > My guess is that there are great disparities depending on where you 
>live.
> > Inside the central city, bounded roughly by Ben White on the south, 
>MOPAC
> > on the west, and 183 on the north and east, my guess is the % of bike
> > commuters is significantly higher than 1%, but I have no way at present 
>to
> > measure or prove this (I do not have the time to dig into census tract 
>data
> > that might allow me to answer this question). But we know that most of 
>the
> > growth Austin experienced since 1994 has been in the form of 
>auto-oriented
> > sprawl subdivisions outside the central city, which has off-set any 
>gains
> > made inside the central city, where (at least my intuition tells me) the
> > numbers have been climbing. And once we finally get around to completing
> > the Pfluger Bridge and the Lance Armstrong Bikeway, to name just two
> > obvious improvements, the numbers should climb more.
> >
> > There are some encouraging indicators in CAMPO' s survey. Although over 
>90%
> > of commuters drive alone, about 26% of them would be willing to bike 'if
> > conditions are right for them.'  Of this 26%, 37.5%  said they would be
> > either willing or very willing to consider biking if they had 'safer 
>bike
> > paths and lanes', and another 33.7% said they would be willing to do if
> > they had 'safer conditions.'  About 28% of commuters of all types work
> > within 5 miles or less of where they live, an easily bikeable distance. 
>So
> > the potential for increasing the mode share in of biking in Austin is
> > large, as we have saying for many years now.
> >
> > Still, I found it sobering to read how little progress we seem to have 
>made
> > over the last 10-15 years. I also ran across an article from the Austin
> > Chronicle where Rick Waring, the city's Bike Coordinator in the mid 
>1990s,
> > said his goal was to increase bike commuting to 8% of work trips by 
>2015.
> > We have a lot of work to do. And does any one on this list recall if 
>CAMPO
> > (known earlier as ATS or Austin Transportation Study) had a specific
> > numerical goal for bike commuting? I think they did but cannot find  it.
> >
> > My hope is that the Envision Central Texas vision takes hold of policy
> > makers and we do urban infill and mixed-use, transit-oriented 
>development
> > where we can. Check out the 'resources' link on the
> > www.envisionsentraltexas.org web page for information about emerging 
>plans
> > or proposal for transit oriented development.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Get on or off this list here:  http://BicycleAustin.info/list
>
>
>
>
>--
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Lane Wimberley, Wayport, Inc.,  512.519.6195 (voice)  512.519.6200 (fax)
>Southpark Commerce Center II, 4509 Freidrich Lane, Austin, TX 78744
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Get on or off this list here:  http://BicycleAustin.info/list