AUSTIN:
Political
Pedal
In 1997, following the
fact that a drunk motorist who killed a cyclist
didn't
even get a ticket for his crime, David Foster
organized a bike ride to give local elected
officials an opportunity to show support for
bicycle transportation, and to provide an
opportunity for cyclists and elected officials to
share concerns and ideas. The ride, which became
known as the Political Pedal, has happened in
Austin every May since then, with incumbent
councilmembers and candidates participating in the
ride. Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) has also
participated. This year's ride is scheduled for
Friday, May 16, beginning at 8th and Congress at
4:30 PM. Riders will go to the Capital for a
few short speeches, then proceed to an as yet
undetermined site for a Bicycle Happy Hour. Doggett
has once again agreed to participate, and council
members and other elected officials has been
invited. (Contact:)
AUSTIN:
Death
of the local bike movement?
Ten years ago, there was no
practically no bicycle movement in Austin. There
was no Critical Mass, no city Bicycle Program
office, no radio show, no Yellow Bike Project, no
Bicycle Month celebration,and no website. Then
suddenly, within four years, we had all those
things. Each new milestone and project seemed to
spawn another.
And now things seem to be dying
down again. Reportedly only three people showed up
for the last Critical Mass ride. And this May is
the first time in years that a Bike Month program
hasn't been actively planned and carried out.
Why did this happen? Well, it's
common for activists to move on. (For me, faced
with the need to earn an income I've limited my
activities to maintaining the website and
publishing this newsletter. Others have limited
their activities or dropped out altogether.) But
usually those who move on in some movement are
replaced by a new, often younger, more enthusiastic
crowd. It just didn't happen in this case.
Things aren't completely
dead, of course, but it's nothing like the glory
days of the mid-90's. And there's no reason it
can't happen again, if some committed people decide
to throw themselves into it.
Below, Eric Anderson shares
his frustration with the fact that the community
failed to put on a Bike Month this year.
To my knowledge
there will be no Bike Month Full Moon Bike Ride.
In fact, there will likely not be any Bike Month
events this year other than a probable
Wheatsville Bike Swap (date unknown) and the
Political Pedal ride.
I am sorry to share
this depressing reality of our Austin bicycle
scene, but leading bicycle organizations have
not regarded Bike Austin! Month events as a
priority, in spite of their past participation
and some great ad-hoc community leadership by
people like Katherine Otto in
particular.
I am perplexed by the
disinterest of Austin bicycle organizations in
such a no-brainer as an annual celebration of
bicycling. No wonder achieving barrier crossings
of 290 or 183, finishing the Pfluger Bridge, or
a Nueces Bike Boulevard (etc., etc.) all remain
distant goals fraught with imponderable
complexities, rather than immediate priorities
backed up by a broad-based coalition of bicycle,
neighborhood and accessibility
constituencies.
Someday perhaps this
will all change, finally allowing Austin an
honest claim as a top-rated bicycling city.
Until then, we can look forward to an ever
plummeting modal-split and ever more circular
conversations.
San Antonio:
Thong-wearing
cyclist annoys
park-goers
Readers of this newsletter
know of my interest in that strange intersection of
bicycling and nudity. Here's another case of those
concepts colliding, courtesy of the San Antonio
Express news:
San
Antonio Park Police have received several
complaints over the past month about a man who
cruises on a bicycle wearing only shoes and a
thong -- a swimsuit or undergarment that doesn't
cover the buttocks. Though he appears nearly
naked from time to time, Joseph Gottschalk is
legally covered. According to state law, no
offense is committed if the man has 'his anus
and genitals' covered, Castro said. Which the
thong does, if nothing else. Gottschalk, 52, an
unemployed truck driver who dabbles in
carpentry, is aware of his rights and compares
riding nearly naked to driving the maximum legal
speed limit. (read
whole article)
Texas:
Bicyclists
to be driven off the road by
redistricting
It's an old political
game: Politicians redraw the district maps to
secure their power. If Party A is in power and
Party B has a large base of support in a certain
area, then Party B draws a line right through the
middle of it when redistricting to break it up.
Presto: The supporters of Party B in that area have
now been divided into two separate districts,
diluting their voting power.
That's what the Republicans are doing right now
in the Texas Congress. Austin's U.S.
representative, Democrat Lloyd Doggett, may soon be
out of a job. That's too bad, because Doggett has
been a strong supporter of bikes, riding with
cyclists on the Political Pedal rides, and even
riding his bike to work at the Capitol in
Washington. And the Texas legislators about to
redistrict him into oblivion are those like
Republican Senator Jeff Wentworth, the subject of
an ethics investigation, who in the last session
introduced a bill that would have banned cyclists
from the roads in certain conditions and which
would have required cyclists to wear slow-moving
emblem triangles. (The bill died in committee,
thankfully.) (Read
an article about the redistricting
mess)
NEW YORK:
Bike
Loop around
Manhattan
From the New York Times:
"In its modest way, it has been a quest as
irrepressible as sailing a ship around the globe.
New York's Magellans on bicycles have long yearned
to complete a loop of Manhattan Island. The chief
obstacle has always been that Manhattan's shores,
unlike those, say, of Paris, were designed for
commerce and commuting, and only in a few patches
for pleasure. But slowly, the city has been hacking
out a trail from the jungle of piers, railroad
tracks, highway ramps, factories and scrap heaps
that ring Manhattan. By this fall, the Department
of Parks and Recreation hopes to carve out (or in
parts mark out) a 32-mile circuit that will take
bikers from the Battery up the West Side, past the
George Washington Bridge almost to the northern tip
of Manhattan, then down the Harlem and East Rivers
and back to the Battery." (read
whole article)
CHINA:
What's
it like to cycle in
China?
Riley Geary shares his
experiences on the Chinese bicycle culture of a
two-month trip there. He describes what kinds of
bicycles the Chinese ride, how they ride in
traffic, how they deal with repairs, and more. An
interesting look at Chinese bike culture. Read the
article at: Chinese
Bicycles and the Cycling Experience.
Fuel
economy hits 22-year low
U.S. fuel economy hit its lowest
point in 22 years. While it may be tempting to
blame the big bad George W., that would be lazy:
Bush is simply continuing the policies of the
Clinton administration. Fuel economy improved under
Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, and Bush Sr., and then
came to a grinding halt with the Clinton
presidency.
It's also tempting to lay the rest
of the blame on the automakers. But the fact is,
they make more efficient cars, Americans just
aren't buying them. Ultimately, the largest share
of the blame must go to those buying and driving
the inefficient cars: the citizenry.
Here's a New
York Times article on this
topic.
National survey
of bicycling and walking yields no
surprises
A new survey by the U.S.
Department of Transportation finds that Americans
don't walk or bicycle very much. Fewer than 30% of
Americans ride a bike even once during the summer
months. (read
the article)
City, suburban
designs could be bad for your health
From USA Today:
Why don't Americans walk anywhere?
Old answer: They're lazy.
New answer: They can't.
There is no sidewalk outside the front door,
school is 5 miles away, and there's a six-lane
highway between home and the supermarket. Many
experts on public health say the way
neighborhoods are built is to blame for
Americans' physical inactivity -- and the
resulting epidemic of obesity. (read
article)
Dealing with
aggressive motorists
advice from the email list
Michael Zakes writes:
When motorists honk or yell at me, I
wave at them like they're my best friend that I
haven't seen in years. The more they honk, the
more I wave. if nothing else it confuses the
hell out of them since they aren't getting the
desired response of pissing me off.
Lauren writes:
That's a great tip, thanks. On Friday
on my way home from work I got honked at for
being on the road, so I grinned and waved
happily. This morning on my way to work a
passenger in the car passing me yelled out the
window for me to get off the road and onto the
sidewalk. Again, I smiled happily, yelled hello,
and waved vigorously.
I felt good and arrived at my destination
relaxed and calm. This solution is great,
especially for those situations where you really
don't get an opportunity to inform and educate
anyway. If a car is moving past me at anywhere
from 30-45 miles per hour, I only have a split
second to make an impact, so it's not realistic
for me to start my dissertation on cyclists'
rights and the law. It's much more fun for me to
enjoy myself, and also cause them to wonder -
just why is she so happy when I yelled at
her...hmmm...maybe there is something to being a
crazy cyclist!
Fred Meredith writes:
If the motorist is still within earshot
after they yell at you, then smile, wave, and
shout, "Hey, say Hi to your cousin, I haven't
seen (him or her) lately." It might drive them
crazy trying to figure out who you are and how
you know them.
Personally, I have tried to curb my habit of
giving the finger or any negative gesture to a
motorist who is in my way or seemingly acting
like a jerk. What if I flip the bird and then
realize it is my aunt, uncle or cousin. That
might be embarrassing.
Lance Armstrong
pushes SUV's
In a move that doesn't surprise us at
all, sports cycling celebrity Lance Armstrong is
getting $12 million to push Subarus, including
SUV's. (read
article)
Are bike lanes
always the answer?
Bike advocate
Tommy Eden is pushing for bike lanes to be
striped on the major downtown streets of
Guadalupe and Lavaca in Austin, Texas. Here at
Car-Free World we like bike lanes, if for no
other reason that we know that more people would
ride bikes if there were more bike lanes. But
these posts to a local email list show that even
cyclists have some reservations about bike lanes
-- both on these streets specifically, and in
general. This is certainly food for thought for
those advocating for bike facilities
elsewhere.
Questioning
the safety of bicycle
lanes
by,
May 1, 2003
You may FEEL safer, but it may be a false sense
of security. The only thing that is going to
actually make you safer on those streets is how you
and the other road users behave....
If the bike lane is painted to the intersection,
are you going to stay in it if you go straight
across the intersection?
What should the car turning at that intersection
do? Should he/she come over into the bike lane to
make the turn? Do they know that?
Are you going to stay in the bike lane if it is
right next to parked cars [any one of which
could open its door in your path]? If cars are
parked on the left side of a one-way street and
there is a bike lane on the left side, are there
special considerations you should keep in mind?
Why is the bike lane any safer than being out in
the middle of the traffic lane? There are lots of
other lanes for the rest of the road users, why
shouldn't you have one? If you feel unsafe in a
traffic lane, then maybe you need more
experience/practice/or something. Maybe less
paranoia.
Questioning
the importance of bike lanes on Guadalupe &
Lavaca
by,
April 30, 2003
[This is what Mike Dahmus submitted
to the Austin City Council.]
I'm a part-time cyclist and part-time driver who
sits on the UTC with Tommy, and I respectfully
disagree with his position on bicycle lanes
downtown. Due to work and childcare issues, I won't
be able to speak at the meeting. I believe the
position I hold represents fairly well the
perspective of the cyclists who operate outside the
immediate center-city area, as well as the
perspective of cyclists who also drive. I would
wager that relatively few of those people will be
able to speak at the meeting either; and thus, you
may be getting a fairly non-representative sample
of opinion. My bicycle route to work currently
takes me down Guadalupe in the morning and up
Lavaca in the evening; so I feel quite qualified to
assess the route's usability compared to the
suburban routes I've had to take to work at various
times.
More in-depth discussion why I think this is a
bad idea was already posted to the austin-bikes
list, and is available upon request; I have
condensed to the essential minimum here:
1. The bicyclist in question (whose death is the
impetus for this move) was riding on the sidewalk,
even though he was supposedly an expert cyclist. We
cannot protect cyclists who ought to know better
from their own bad decisions. Additionally, this
was at night; and he may not have had lights.
2. Guadalupe and Lavaca's automobile traffic is
currently slow enough that most national bike
facilities experts would not recommend even a wide
outside lane as an appropriate bicycle facility,
much less bike lanes. Traffic is held to a maximum
of 25 mph (usually much slower) by signalization;
which is a perfectly adequate speed for adult
cycling in traffic.
3. Bike lanes on one-way streets with short
blocks present additional problems with turning at
intersections (not my contribution; but I think
it's a valid issue).
4. Nearby parallel routes exist with very light
automobile traffic (nearby meaning less than 3
blocks away).
5. Our city's bicycle funding and 'attention'
should be spent where the biggest problems are -
the outlying parts of the city of Austin (where
parallel routes as in #4 are miles rather than
blocks away).
6. More practically, it is a bad idea to push
for a plan which results in the loss of a car lane
or a parking lane downtown; this will result in
backlash which could impact other, more worthy,
bicycle projects in the future.
As a cyclist and a driver, I ask you not to
support a move which would install bicycle lanes on
Guadalupe and Lavaca.
Thanks for your time,
Mike Dahmus
Free bike
ads
Ads are
FREE for individuals and run for at least four
months or until you tell me to remove it. Please
keep it to four lines, don't write a novel.
:)
- Adult
Trikes for sale. Genuine
Worksman-brand adult tricycles starting at
$290. Heavy duty, 450-lbs. payload capacity,
made in U.S.A. click
to see
-
- 2002 Giant Rincon: 17"
Frame (Red). In good condition. Entry level
Shimano components. Will include new brake
cables. $150
10-02
- Zullo steel racing /
track bike, 56 mm frame, all Campy parts,
derailer gearing but has one-speed dropouts for
fixed gear conversion, in good shape expect for
torn decal,
$250.,
453-0438
10-02
- 2001 model Marin
Larkspur. 17.5". Aluminum frame, Shimano
components, lock, lights, shock seat post. Great
transportation. Recently purchased for $350
(have receipt), will sell for $250. Excellent
condition, like new. 512-476-2887 or
512-689-9266.10-02
Used
inventory at Waterloo
Cycles
|
Inventory
as of April 13, 2003. All bikes subject
to prior sale, limited to stock on
hand, not responsible for typographical
errors, prices may change without
notice, batteries not included.
|
- $199 Cignal Ranger 20"
- $229 Diamondback Sorrento
16"
- $369 Haro Extreme Comp
19.5"
- $399 KHS Montana Comp
19"
- $399 Diamondback Response
14"
- $549 Kona Lava Dome 20"
- $699 Cannondale F400
21"
- $699 Kona Sex One 20"
|
- $ 99 Alpine Sporten
15"G
- $549 Fuji Opus III 49cm
- $269 Schwinn 454 53cm
- $399 Specialized Allez
53cm
- $549 Bianchi Campione
54cm
- $499 Specialized Sirrus
58cm
- $599 Diamondback Expert 58
cm
- $99 Schwinn
Aerostar
- $129 Diamondback
Impression
|
back
to contents
That's
all, thanks for reading!
|