You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I work in West Campus, so I walk past this spot quite a bit. I think this is a dumb idea and should be replaced with a sharrow in the right lane of Guadalupe.
One thing I'd like to point out is that there is a very long row of bike racks that separates the sidewalk proper from the protected bike gutter. I'm guessing that the advocates for this project will say that this row of racks will discourage pedestrians from walking into the gutter, erm, bike lane. What I've noticed in practice, however, is that pedestrians do avoid the bike racks when going to the bus bulb-out, but they do it by walking into the gutter, down the whole length of the bulb-out, and then onto the bulb-out. The fence and bike racks seem to encourage more pedestrians in the bike lane/gutter than if they were just crossing straight across.
I also want to add that I think that this is a terrible project and should be opposed, but the real problem here is that there was no public input process about a change to a bike facility, particularly one as important as this one.
I think the estimate of 25-30 cyclists in the Critical Mass ride is a little high. I was at PCL around 5:45 when I saw the forum digest mentioning the ride, so I decided to walk over to the west mall to see how many people were there. There were maybe a dozen people when they started to take off. Here's a photo of the "mass" that I took around 6:15:
It's possible the group picked up more people as the ride progressed, but it seems unlikely it would double in size.
I don't agree with the Critical Mass tactic – as its practiced in Austin at least. That said, the participants yesterday were really young, only a handful looked over 25. It's probably more productive to organize events that present cycling in a positive light than try to keep angry rebellious youth from acting like angry rebellious youth.
Pages: 1
[ Generated in 0.124 seconds, 7 queries executed - Memory usage: 498.4 KiB (Peak: 499.02 KiB) ]