<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=447&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Bicycle Austin forum / Seton Study redux]]></title>
		<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?id=447</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Seton Study redux.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB 1.5.11</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Seton Study redux]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=1392#p1392</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am by no means for a law requiring bicyclists to wear helmets, but you can bet I will continue to wear mine when I get a new one.&#160; If motorcyclists don&#039;t have to, then bicyclists shouldn&#039;t be required to either.&#160; You can also bet if I were a motorcyclist I would were one too, but there is no motorcycle in my future, only a new tandem.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ParmerSurvivor)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=1392#p1392</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Seton Study redux]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=1386#p1386</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Remember the Seton study that they started did a few years back?</p><p>Well, if you want to read the actual study (it wasn&#039;t done at the time), here it is --</p><p><a href="http://www.bikeforums.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=131022&amp;d=1262472722" rel="ugc">http://www.bikeforums.net/attachment.ph … 1262472722</a></p><p>I particularly like this part --</p><p>&#160; &#160;Although our data set did not find significance in relative risk of cycling without helmet<br />&#160; &#160;(most likely due to small sample size), it did show a trend consistent with previous studies<br />&#160; &#160;that form an over-whelming body of evidence that helmets prevent injuries and save lives,<br />&#160; &#160;and laws should be passed to encourage cyclists to wear helmets. </p><p>... so, upon looking more closely at the data, he found that it didn&#039;t actually say that helmets<br />prevent injuries (even though the initial press releases said that the data very strongly<br />suggested that), but he still he somehow found encouragement to keep pushing for helmet laws.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dougmc)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=1386#p1386</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
