<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=252&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Bicycle Austin forum / Travis County traffic deaths in 2008]]></title>
		<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?id=252</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Travis County traffic deaths in 2008.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB 1.5.11</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Travis County traffic deaths in 2008]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=902#p902</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, another reason that fatalities are going down is that maybe fewer people are cycling.&#160; I hope that is not the case.&#160; Definitely too many confounding variables to come to any absolute conclusions.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (lluciano)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=902#p902</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Travis County traffic deaths in 2008]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=899#p899</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>One possible explanation for fatalities going down as population increases, is that increased population means more traffic congestion, and that means slower speeds, and slower speeds mean less carnage.</p><p>Just a theory.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (MichaelBluejay)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=899#p899</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Travis County traffic deaths in 2008]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=892#p892</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><blockquote><div><p>- There are 95 people listed on that page. So, perhaps it&#039;s 59 motor vehicle + 18 pedestrians + 22 motorcyclists + 1 bicyclist - 5 unpublished names?</p><p>- That screwy math then makes all their percentage charts a real crapshoot as to actual numbers.</p><p>- I seem to remember more than one bicyclist death last year, but going back through the mailing list it seems that there was only the one /in austin/. One more in Kyle and another near Fredricksburg.</p><p>- I&#039;m kind of impressed that, with the population growth since 1995, the trendline on traffic fatalities is down, not up.</p><p>- Across the state DPS reports ~50 cyclist deaths/year from 2003-2007.&#160; 1 in Austin seems like a pretty good number in relation to that (worse than zero for sure).</p></div></blockquote></div><p>Okay, so I misunderstood the numbers listed on the American-Statesman&#039;s graphic.&#160; That explains why some of the numbers didn&#039;t fit together properly.&#160; Just take a look at their PDF and read _very_ carefully.</p><p>I&#039;ll try to correct my original interpretations, but you may be best looking at the PDF yourself or doing your own research using raw data:</p><p>* There were _95_ traffic fatalities in _Travis County_ in 2008.<br />* Presumably, of those 95, there were 54 motor vehicle fatalities:&#160; 95 total - 1 bicyclist - 18 pedestrians - 22 motorcyclists = 54 unaccounted and therefore, presumably, motor vehicle occupants (4+ wheels)<br />* The deadliest hour of the day was 2-3am, claiming 17.9% of the total _95_ fatalities, so 17 of the 95 occurred in that hour of the day.&#160; (Average percentage per hour-of-day is necessarily 100/24 = 4.2%.)<br />* There were no fatalities between 9-10am.<br />* No one younger than 11 died in traffic in 2008.<br />* The following only applies to Austin (not to Travis County as a whole):&#160; Of the last 14 years (all of those shown), only two years have had fewer traffic fatalities than 2008 (59):&#160; 1999 (55) and 2003 (52).</p><p>Thanks to Andy Webb for bringing my misinterpretation to our attention.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tomwald)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=892#p892</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Travis County traffic deaths in 2008]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=891#p891</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Austin American-Statesman has published a map, list, and some minor analysis of the Travis County traffic deaths of 2008.<br /><a href="http://alt.coxnewsweb.com/statesman/pdf/01/0124AustinFatalities2008.pdf" rel="ugc">http://alt.coxnewsweb.com/statesman/pdf … es2008.pdf</a></p><p>Notable, especially for this forum:<br />* Of the 59 fatalities, 1 was a bicyclist (Chris Davis), 18 were pedestrians, and 22 were motorcyclists.&#160; I think the assumption is that the other 18 fatalities were in motor vehicles (with at least 4 wheels).<br />* The deadliest hour of the day was 2-3am, claiming 17.9% of the total (though my math shows this to be about 10.56 people).<br />* There were no fatalities between 9-10am.<br />* No one younger than 11 died in traffic in 2008.<br />* Of the last 14 years (all of those shown), only two years have had fewer traffic fatalities, 1999 (55) and 2003 (52).</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (tomwald)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=891#p891</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
