<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=2497&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Bicycle Austin forum / Thoughts on Shoal Creek Trail Gaps Connectivity Project?]]></title>
		<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2497</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Thoughts on Shoal Creek Trail Gaps Connectivity Project?.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 06:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB 1.5.11</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Thoughts on Shoal Creek Trail Gaps Connectivity Project?]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7798#p7798</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Chris, thank you very much for the detailed writeup!</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (MichaelBluejay)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 06:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7798#p7798</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Thoughts on Shoal Creek Trail Gaps Connectivity Project?]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7797#p7797</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Here are my thoughts on the Shoal Creek Trail Gaps Connectivity Project:</p><p>-- The design for the south gap looks great. Instead of that narrow sidewalk along Lamar north of the 24th Street underpass, we’d get a new 12-foot-wide concrete trail with a planted buffer. My only suggestion would be to plant more trees along the trail, ideally within the planted buffer separating the trail from the street.</p><p>-- The same goes for the middle gap (29th to 31st), which would extend the new 12-foot-wide concrete trail northward. This would also be great, and even better if they could add some trees. At the intersection of 31st &amp; Shoal Creek Blvd., where there have been a lot of crashes, there are 3 design options:&#160; (1) no-build; (2) adding a new concrete diverter that would prevent cars exiting 31st from turning left (but would include a cut-through for westbound bikes); and (3) replacing the current pedestrian-hybrid beacon with a regular traffic signal. Either (2) or (3) would be fine; I’d lean toward (2).</p><p>-- The north gap (31st to 34th St.) is definitely the most controversial; the city has been wrestling with this part for years. For this survey, they’ve divided it into 2 segments of roughly equal length; the dividing point is the trailhead where you can descend a steep existing trail and continue northward on a concrete path that nears the creek. For each of the two segments (east &amp; west), there are 4 design options.</p><p>For the eastern part (from Lamar to the trailhead):</p><ul><li><p>Options 1 &amp; 2 feature a 2-way, 10-12 feet wide, concrete shared-use path at the sidewalk level along the south side of the street. Option 1 would keep 2-way car traffic with yield flow; option 2 would restrict car traffic on part of the street to 1-way westbound to avoid the need for yield flow.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Option 3 would provide a similar path behind the north curb. This would allow more room for cars, so there’d be 2-way car traffic with no yield flow.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Option 4 offers no separate trail for bikes at all; there would be somewhat widened sidewalks for pedestrians, but bikes would be left in the street with no protection other than speed cushions (to calm traffic) and sharrows.</p></li></ul><p>This is supposed to be an all-ages, all-abilities facility, so I’d support either option 1 or option 2. Option 3 would add dangerous crossings of streets &amp; driveways, and option 4 would provide no separation from cars at all.</p><p>For the western part (from the trailhead to 34th Street):</p><ul><li><p>As with the eastern part, options 1 &amp; 2 feature a 2-way, 10-12 feet wide, concrete shared-use path at the sidewalk level along the south/west side of the street. Option 1 would keep 2-way car traffic with yield flow; option 2 would restrict car traffic on part of the street to 1-way west/northbound to avoid the need for yield flow. As the trail approaches 34th Street, it would shift westward and join the existing trail.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>Option 3 would follow the existing trail that drops down toward the creek. The trail would be widened to 10-12 feet, and the steepness would be reduced to meet ADA standards.</p></li></ul><ul><li><p>As with the eastern part, option 4 would offer no separate trail for bikes at all; there would be a sidewalk on the south/west side for pedestrians, but bikes would be left in the street with no protection other than speed cushions and sharrows.</p></li></ul><p>Option 3 would definitely be an improvement over what’s there today, but I’d prefer either option 1 or option 2, because they’d involve less grade change. The Shoal Creek Conservancy supports option 3 for this part because it aligns with the Shoal Creek Trail plan, which envisions the trail within the greenway. They’ve got some helpful guidance on their blog:<br /><a href="https://shoalcreekconservancy.org/comment-on-24th-34th-shoal-creek-trail-gap-proposal/" rel="ugc">https://shoalcreekconservancy.org/comme … -proposal/</a> .</p><p>Safe Streets Austin is aiming to do a newsletter about this soon. If you’re not on their list yet, you can sign up (for free!) at <a href="https://www.safestreetsaustin.org/join-our-mailing-list" rel="ugc">https://www.safestreetsaustin.org/join-our-mailing-list</a> .</p><p>The deadline for taking the survey is Sunday, October 8.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (ChrisRiley)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 05:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7797#p7797</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Thoughts on Shoal Creek Trail Gaps Connectivity Project?]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7796#p7796</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have an opinion on the Shoal Creek Trail Gap Connectivity Project?&#160; I have a hard time sorting through all the information, and would be happy to amplify any strong pros or cons through the survey.&#160; (My only opinion right now is:&#160; &quot;whatever, do it--finish the trail!&quot;)</p><p>Per my councilmember&#039;s newsletter:&#160; <br />Shoal Creek Trail Gaps Improvement Project<br />The City of Austin is seeking to improve connections of the Shoal Creek Trail by filling the 3 remaining gaps:<br />•&#160; &#160; 24th St. to 2800 Shoal Creek Blvd.<br />•&#160; &#160; 29th St. to 31st St.<br />•&#160; &#160; 31st St. to 34th St.</p><p>It’s not too late to share your feedback! <br />1.&#160; Stop by the next pop-up: Saturday, Sept. 30, 9-11 a.m. near the intersection of Shoal Creek Blvd. and North Lamar<br />2. Fill out the virtual survey.https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PP9WFFY<br />3.&#160; Learn more on the project webpage <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/465cad434b9c465c8a9e2f9d976b6c49" rel="ugc">https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/46 … 9d976b6c49</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (chavela)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7796#p7796</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
