Now let's talk about traffic.  I can't easily describe how the Indian traffic system works, it really has to be experienced.  For the most part, it's complete anarchy.  There are no discernible rules.  The streets are a jumble of auto-rickshaws (three-wheeled motorcycles with a car-like body dropped on top, motorcycles, bicycle rickshaws, cargo bikes, bicycles, cars, buses, people, and cows.  There are rarely sidewalks, people walk in the street.  There is very rarely any lane striping (or stop signs, or traffic signals).  Everyone jostles for space, and there is a *constant* cacophony of horn-honking.  But here, honking is expected, it means, "Look out, here I come."  The backs of trucks and buses note that expectation with writing saying, "Use horn, please."  I think the prevailing attitude here would usually be, if you get hit, it's your fault for not getting out of the way.

Now, that's for a "normal" collision.  I see their was some outrage over the dooring, which seems to be different.  But really, the streets here are so fantastically dangerous it's hard to comprehend.  I think nearly 90,000 Indians die in traffic collisions each year, which doesn't seem so bad comparing their per capita traffic death rate to that of the U.S., except (1) India has far fewer vehicles than the U.S., and (2) a huge percentage of the population never or only rarely exposes themselves to automobile traffic.  So it's an apples to oranges comparison, but what I can tell you is, it's several, several times more dangerous to be on an Indian road than a U.S. road.  One source I read, which I didn't confirm, said that 75% of road deaths here are pedestrians and another 20% are motorcycles and bicycles.  That leaves just 5% for normal motorists and buses.  It's a fantastic claim, but it wouldn't surprise me.

Crossing a street here can be extremely difficult.  You might think, "Why don't you just wait on the sidewalk for the light to change?"  My first question in response to that would be, "What sidewalk?", and the second would be, "What light?"  After one month and six cities, I don't think I've ever seen a traffic signal.  Occasionally there are police directing traffic the old fashioned way, but they're rare.  It's interesting to see the critical mass idea that George Bliss talked about in Return of the Scorcher, where he said that when cyclists would try to cross a busy roadway, they'd wait until more and more and more cyclists would roll up waiting, and eventually they'd all force themselves into the roadway and stop traffic with their sheer numbers so they can cross.  Pedestrians do the same thing here.  But sometimes you have to wait a long time for there to be enough pedestrians.  And even when there are, there's no guarantee that one or more of them won't get hit.

About speeding, rare is the city here in which speeding would even be possible.  The roads are too thick with vehicles, people, and animals.

Anyway, it's a sad story, and it's not the only one here.

"The driver of the bus has been arrested and charged"?  Perhaps the bus driver was exceeding the speed limit?  The article says the bus was "speeding", though the use of the term here may not itself suggest a traffic violation.

The car driver's vehicle "was damaged by a mob"?