<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/extern.php?action=feed&amp;tid=1938&amp;type=rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title><![CDATA[Bicycle Austin forum / Lots of recent car-on-pedestrian collisions (March 2016)]]></title>
		<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?id=1938</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Lots of recent car-on-pedestrian collisions (March 2016).]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 20:48:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FluxBB 1.5.11</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lots of recent car-on-pedestrian collisions (March 2016)]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7058#p7058</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dougmc wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>...it&#039;s explicitly stating that the officer does not trust the account...</p></div></blockquote></div><p>I don&#039;t read it that way at all; quite the opposite.&#160; My reading is certainly how the author of the Chronicle took it.</p><p>I think neutral wording would be &quot;<strong>If</strong> the driver&#039;s account is generally accurate&quot;, not &quot;<strong>Assuming</strong>&quot; it is.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (MichaelBluejay)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 20:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7058#p7058</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lots of recent car-on-pedestrian collisions (March 2016)]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7057#p7057</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I haven&#039;t read the actual report myself, but &quot;assuming [the driver&#039;s] account is generally accurate&quot; actually sounds pretty fair to me -- it&#039;s explicitly stating that the officer does not trust the account but is doing it in the most polite way possible.&#160; And the police report is a public document, and so the police officers can&#039;t always be as frank as they&#039;d like to be.</p><p>It sounds like there&#039;s a lot to be concerned about in the report, though those specific words probably shouldn&#039;t be part of it.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dougmc)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7057#p7057</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Lots of recent car-on-pedestrian collisions (March 2016)]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7056#p7056</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>About one of those ped deaths, it gets really macabre.&#160; Adrienne White&#039;s father was hit by a drunk driver, but survived.&#160; White&#039;s uncle Dennis came to town to comfort her and her father during the father&#039;s recovery, but while walking to Brackenridge to see the father, Dennis was killed by a driver.&#160; You can&#039;t make this stuff up.</p><p>White had a column in the Chronicle about this, which I&#039;m just now seeing. It reads like something I could have written.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>Adrienne White wrote:</cite><blockquote><div><p>Two weeks after my uncle&#039;s death, I was stunned to read that APD Chief Art Acevedo&#039;s solution for reducing pedestrian deaths in Austin is to ticket more jaywalkers.&#160; Our infrastructure has always been designed for cars, and it feds as though pedestrian and cyclist facilities only result as an afterthought.&#160; Infrastructure is not APD&#039;s department, but how APD favors ticketing cyclists and pedestrians, both of whom are vulnerable road users -- over holding negligent drivers accountable -- is....These perpetrators rarely get prosecuted and often get off on a much less punitive plea deal.&#160; To add insult to injury, APD now wants to point the blame at these aggrieved, vulnerable road users who already suffer from the lack of an equitable and safe roadway system.</p><p>I recently received a copy of the crash report for my father&#039;s incident, which leaves me very concerned about the investigation.&#160; One of the responding officers wrote, &quot;assuming [the driver&#039;s] account is generally accurate...&quot; in the report.&#160; The account of this driver—cited for intoxication assault; with an existing record of assault, aggravated robbery, and possession of cocaine; and who was violating parole when he was apprehended—is to be presumed &quot;accurate&quot;?...He claims he swerved, yet there was no indication of brake marks....But the law is willing to rely on a recurring and violent offender&#039;s report because my father was incapable of providing a statement at the time of the accident.&#160; This is yet another example of a broken system.....</p><p>It makes me wonder if these policies—which vilify vulnerable road users—are why so many motorists get off with a slap on the wrist when they hit pedestrians and cyclists, compared to when a crash involves another motorist.&#160; I believe that our city will never become a safe place for pedestrians and cyclists if we keep blaming them for vehicular crashes.&#160; Drivers have little incentive to change their behaviors if there are no repercussions for their risky, distracted actions.</p><p><a href="https://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2016-05-13/notes-on-kamp-justice-for-pedestrians/" rel="ugc">https://www.austinchronicle.com/news/20 … destrians/</a></p></div></blockquote></div>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (MichaelBluejay)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2019 05:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=7056#p7056</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lots of recent car-on-pedestrian collisions (March 2016)]]></title>
			<link>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=6018#p6018</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent article in Patch runs down lots of recent car-on-ped collisions:</p><p><a href="http://patch.com/texas/eastaustin/man-his-dog-hit-vehicle-east-austin" rel="ugc">http://patch.com/texas/eastaustin/man-h … ast-austin</a></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (MichaelBluejay)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 23:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=6018#p6018</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
